|
|
KAGIN'S COLUMNON THE CASE OF THE FROZEN EMBRYO
Ever seen an icon of a pregnant Virgin Mary? How about a mosaic of the divine vaginal delivery? Human beings, like other mammals, reproduce themselves by sexual contact. This fact bothers religious people who believe sex is sinful. They may not know they think this way, but they do. Sex is perceived by Christian mythology as the original sin or the result of, or punishment for, disobedience to the deity. Sex is discouraged, hence celibate nuns and priests. The Catholic church, per edicts of aged male celibates, proclaims the only purpose and only morally acceptable use for sex is the production of children, each a unique gift from the deity. The use of sex for pleasure, joy, fun, or celebration with no intent to reproduce is a sin, a minority view shared by other diverse Christian sects, and rejected by the majority of the world's historic religions. Since the belief is divinely correct, sex that results in conception has fulfilled its only acceptable purpose. The products of conception are considered human life, supernaturally created. To treat a zygote otherwise would legitimize sex for play, not procreation. If a child is unwanted or a fetus defective, or if you can't take care of yourself, much less a child, too bad. If you want to play, you've got to pay. And, this belief system, coming from the deity, justifies itself forcing the belief on those who think the system stupid. If all that's not bizarre enough, the view extends to the non-sexual union of human male and female reproductive material in a laboratory. Join a fertile egg and sperm and, bingo, you've got a human being with legal rights. A while back, a married couple achieved laboratory fertilization of some of her eggs with his sperm. The resulting embryos were frozen, presumably awaiting fetus transplant to a rent-a-womb. When the couple divorced, the products of conception became a disputed asset of the marriage. What happened inspired the following:
Edwin Kagin
|
|